26997
puke: "If someone want's to continue a discussion on a single topic then make a new thread."
thanks puke
nb4 Dude-Just-Drop-It's...i understand and agree with the recent thread being closed but, with puke's blessing, i'm not just gonna leave an unresolved discourse the way it was left. at least now it's focused and won't end up another long train of confusion and misunderstanding.
@ant1
"honestly i think calling someone a shithead is less egregious than, say, taking part in a heated debate with people and then editing all your posts to make it look like you had no part in it / and or were playing the role of peacemaker. i see that one of your less involved/mild-mannered posts managed to somehow remain unscathed by your little joke to mootbooxle. read the thread now - it's clearly an unfair representation of what actually was said."
it wasn't a joke to mootbooxle. he completely trivialized my response to rainwarrior and it pissed me off. the one response i left unedited was intentional, i thought the trail of strikethroughs leading up to that post within the context would have made an obvious point. so i guess my whole strikethrough response was a bit cryptic and prone to misinterpretation, but that's what i chose to do rather than going on yet another 'wahh, why are you being so mean?' tangent.
"given the topic of the thread in general maybe it was an appropriate place for you to demonstrate your willingness to erase from history anything you've done that you later find embarrassing"
that would have been cool, but it wasn't the intent. and i'm past caring about embarrassment. i just want to resolve whatever it is that's going on.
thanks puke
nb4 Dude-Just-Drop-It's...i understand and agree with the recent thread being closed but, with puke's blessing, i'm not just gonna leave an unresolved discourse the way it was left. at least now it's focused and won't end up another long train of confusion and misunderstanding.
@ant1
"honestly i think calling someone a shithead is less egregious than, say, taking part in a heated debate with people and then editing all your posts to make it look like you had no part in it / and or were playing the role of peacemaker. i see that one of your less involved/mild-mannered posts managed to somehow remain unscathed by your little joke to mootbooxle. read the thread now - it's clearly an unfair representation of what actually was said."
it wasn't a joke to mootbooxle. he completely trivialized my response to rainwarrior and it pissed me off. the one response i left unedited was intentional, i thought the trail of strikethroughs leading up to that post within the context would have made an obvious point. so i guess my whole strikethrough response was a bit cryptic and prone to misinterpretation, but that's what i chose to do rather than going on yet another 'wahh, why are you being so mean?' tangent.
"given the topic of the thread in general maybe it was an appropriate place for you to demonstrate your willingness to erase from history anything you've done that you later find embarrassing"
that would have been cool, but it wasn't the intent. and i'm past caring about embarrassment. i just want to resolve whatever it is that's going on.