23340
context: Rendergate 2013 http://battleofthebits.com/arena/Entry/dogclub.xm/8822/
it gave me the idea that maybe original composers (and maybe admins?) should always have the right to replace a render by others if they are unsatisfied with it...
instead of the first render being the definitive render Of All Times, maybe the first render could be just the best render that was got so far, with the potential for original composer and/or admin to replace it as they see fit.
on the other hand it doesn't really matter, since an XM file is an XM file and you cannot dictate exactly how it will be played back. if someone has rendered your XM file with an accurate XM player then that should be an accurate render. i like about these formats (see also: midi) that you cannot dictate exactly how they are played back
but i will put the idea out there. and just imagine how strobe would feel if i renderd one of his tracks with HARDPANZ?!!
How Does This Make You Feel?
it gave me the idea that maybe original composers (and maybe admins?) should always have the right to replace a render by others if they are unsatisfied with it...
instead of the first render being the definitive render Of All Times, maybe the first render could be just the best render that was got so far, with the potential for original composer and/or admin to replace it as they see fit.
on the other hand it doesn't really matter, since an XM file is an XM file and you cannot dictate exactly how it will be played back. if someone has rendered your XM file with an accurate XM player then that should be an accurate render. i like about these formats (see also: midi) that you cannot dictate exactly how they are played back
but i will put the idea out there. and just imagine how strobe would feel if i renderd one of his tracks with HARDPANZ?!!
How Does This Make You Feel?