normally i would not commit a dreaded SOURCE-GIVE but the nsf didn't entirely convey the format of the songs in the way that i intended. so here's the ftm.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/kl9sa22um6xlxr4/Kendrick%20Bacon%20Pro%20Fly%20Fishing%20Adventure.ftm?dl=0

the 6 songs are for a hypothetical nes game where you are protagonist 'kendrick bacon' going on a pro fly fishing adventure to tame a golden fish, probably.

what's wrong with sharing source files?

btw, this entry was great :)

i personally don't see a problem with it, but in the past posting sources under the comments has been scrutinized for various reasons. i wish i knew the exact reasons why people weren't OK with it, but i'm not too clear on it, so don't take me as gospel here!!

it may have to do with cluttering the botb front page with non-comments and instead sources, which isn't the intended purpose of the front page as of now. and maybe it's superfluous in that most of these sources are posted under dropbox or similar hosting sites, and there is potential for the sources to lead to a dead link eventually. for example, if the dropbox account is abandoned and the files deleted, the source link is rendered (heheh) useless.

perhaps there will be an upload source option in the future, but for now i suppose there isn't too much wrong with posting sources under the comments as an alternative!

and thank you!! :)

ah, ok, thanks for the clarification!

I think it was only looked down upon when you retroactively posted like 10 sources in a row for old songs