177802
I noticed that some recent Adlib entries happen to be Furnace modules, which they aren't listed in the "Tools" category of software of the format page at all although they do only use OPL1, OPL2 or OPL3.
This makes me wonder about the legality of the usage of Furnace in adlib, unless we manage to define some limitations over how it should be used in that format on the lyceum.
For example, you wouldn't usually be allowed to pair two of OPL chips; but the problem with this rule is that the original Sound Blaster Pro was a thing and it had two OPL2 chips, so maybe we make an expection with that one. Also we should make it clear that you are just not allowed to use samples in Furnace under the Adlib format, but also no other kind of soundchip; that way we can clearly define a set of rules over the usage of Furnace in Adlib if we want it to be allowed in that format.
I also wonder if overclocking OPL chips will be allowed on the Adlib format, which Furnace allows you to do easily; i'm not sure on that one.
This makes me wonder about the legality of the usage of Furnace in adlib, unless we manage to define some limitations over how it should be used in that format on the lyceum.
For example, you wouldn't usually be allowed to pair two of OPL chips; but the problem with this rule is that the original Sound Blaster Pro was a thing and it had two OPL2 chips, so maybe we make an expection with that one. Also we should make it clear that you are just not allowed to use samples in Furnace under the Adlib format, but also no other kind of soundchip; that way we can clearly define a set of rules over the usage of Furnace in Adlib if we want it to be allowed in that format.
I also wonder if overclocking OPL chips will be allowed on the Adlib format, which Furnace allows you to do easily; i'm not sure on that one.